ACCESS FEED: [MS_AccessPros] Re: Access 2010 and Access 2013

Jumat, 20 Mei 2016

[MS_AccessPros] Re: Access 2010 and Access 2013

Hi Celeste

i thought I responded to this 3 days ago. I guess I didn't hit the Send button.

>>My manager received information that multiple users were not going to be able to use the database at the same time. Is this true?<<

No, that is not true. What was his source? someone trying to sell him another product? Access 2013 can handle 2010 dataabases without a problem. In fact, little actually changed from 2010 to 2013. The web app part improved quite a bit from what I hear, but it's still not good enough for databases that require coding.

The only thing you have to watch out for is the "bitness". Be sure you are using 32-bit Office with both versions. 64-bit Access can't open 32-bit databases.

Regards,

Bill Mosca, Founder - MS_Access_Professionals

http://www.thatlldoit.com

Microsoft Office Access MVP

https://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/PublicProfile/35852?fullName=Bill%20%20Mosca

My nothing-to-do-with-Access blog

http://wrmosca.wordpress.com

---In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com, <bcpatin@gmail.com> wrote :

Hello All:

I successfully created an Access 2010 database (with the help of this group) (.accdb) that houses currently 15,000 records. The database has about 15 users. I split the back end and the front end. The users copy the front end down to their respective hard drives. They input and edit data from the shortcut on their desktop. Several users can be in the database at one time.

My company will soon be getting Access 2013. Are there any problems that I need to be aware of when we get Access 2013? My manager received information that multiple users were not going to be able to use the database at the same time. Is this true?

If so, is there a work around?

Some users will be getting Access 2013 before others. Will the 2013 users be able to access the 2010 database?

Thank you for your help.

Celeste

__._,_.___

Posted by: wrmosca@comcast.net

Reply via web post

•

Reply to sender

•

Reply to group

•