ACCESS FEED: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question

http://www.skrol29.com/us/vtools.php

Darrell

From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Liz Ravenwood
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:36 AM
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question

I'm not seeing anything at www.scroll29.comhttp://www.scroll29.com> and am very interested! :-)

Respectfully,
Liz Ravenwood
Programmer/Analyst
Super First Class Products
B/E Aerospace
O: 1.520.239.4808
www.beaerospace.comhttp://www.beaerospace.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bill Mosca
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:30 PM
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question

Jim

I'd live with it. skroll29.com has a free suite of V-Tools for Access that has an excellent find and replace, but at this point it's much too risky to do something like that.

Regards,

Bill

From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Wagner
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:36 PM
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question

I asked my boss one time if we should consider renaming the tables with the R&D on it, which is 14, spread over 70 databases and probably associated with many thousands of objects like queries, macros and vba code. She smiled and changed the subject before I asked again.

Jim Wagner
________________________________

________________________________
From: acravenrohm yahoo@craven.de >
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question

Oh how we pay for the misdemeanours of our youth :-) As I said, "who am I to judge?" The naming and Collation sequence crimes of my past haunted me until I changed jobs, now I'm haunted by the crimes of others :-D

--- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com , Jim Wagner wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> I shout at myself all the time over that name. It has caused so many issues. It began only as a Hyperion query. I would love to change it but there are so many objects associated with it in so many databases. I was not thinking when I did that.
>
> I will try the currentdb and not shout back Â Jim Wagner
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: acravenrohm
> To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question
>
>
> Â
> If the user has some VBA knowledge then instead of deleting/re-adding it would be easier to use:
>
> currentdb.TableDefs("This_is_my_Table_Name").RefreshLink
>
> (P.S. Please, don't shout about the use of CurrentDB, one can use some
> other, equivalent, object as one's tastes desire.)
>
> (P.P.S. I would like to shout at the person who chose to name a table
> with an ampersand in the name and to severely tsk-tsk the use of a
> minus sign in the table name but, who am I to judge :-) )
>
> --- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com , John Viescas wrote:
> >
> > Andrew-
> >
> >
> >
> > Good thoughts. Also, if you've changed the design on the back end,
> > you need to delete the linked table and relink it.
> >
> >
> >
> > John Viescas, Author
> >
> > Microsoft Access 2010 Inside Out
> >
> > Microsoft Access 2007 Inside Out
> >
> > Microsoft Access 2003 Inside Out
> >
> > Building Microsoft Access Applications
> >
> > SQL Queries for Mere Mortals
> >
> > http://www.viescas.com/
> >
> > (Paris, France)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> > ] On Behalf Of
> > acravenrohm
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:42 PM
> > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > For some reason I can't answer the original posting so sorry for
> > butting in John.
> >
> > Back in the dim-and-distant past, if you linked certain tables to
> > Access you would get different record counts as the driver would
> > return the deleted records as well as the non-deleted ones. I don't
> > for one moment (OK, perhaps one very brief moment) believe this is
> > your problem but it would be interesting to know which ODBC driver
> > you are using and how you set the DSN up.
> >
> > Another idea would be to pick a table with a manageable number of
> > records and do a quick visual scan to see which records show up in
> > Access that don't on the original. Incidentaly, where are you readng
> > the recordcount from in both cases?
> >
> > Yours, Andrew
> >
> > --- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > , Jim Wagner wrote:
> > >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > I created the ODBC called PeopleSoft Ã‚ and the server name is
> > > looking at
> > the correct server but the counts are not the same. other tables are
> > not the same either. I suspect that I need to create a new ODBC and
> > try again.Ã‚
> > > Ã‚
> > > Jim Wagner
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: John Viescas
> > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> >
> > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:56 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question
> > >
> > >
> > > Ã‚
> > > Jim-
> > >
> > > That looks like it is pointing to the database pointed to by the
> > PeopleSoft DSN and the table dbo.R&D-CURRENTEMPLOYEES. If that's the
> > table you're opening in Management Studio, the row counts should be the same.
> > >
> > > John Viescas, Author
> > >
> > > Microsoft Access 2010 Inside Out
> > >
> > > Microsoft Access 2007 Inside Out
> > >
> > > Microsoft Access 2003 Inside Out
> > >
> > > Building Microsoft Access Applications
> > >
> > > SQL Queries for Mere Mortals
> > >
> > > http://www.viescas.com/
> > >
> > > (Paris, France)
> > >
> > > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> >
> > [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > ] On Behalf Of Jim Wagner
> > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 9:44 PM
> > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > I see this
> > >
> > > ODBC;DSN=PeopleSoft ;Trusted_Connection=Yes;APP=Microsoft Office
> > 2010;;TABLE=dbo.R&D-CURRENTEMPLOYEES
> > >
> > > Jim Wagner
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: John Viescas JohnV@ >
> > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> >
> > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:16 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question
> > >
> > > Jim-
> > >
> > > In the Access front end, open the table in Design view (ignore the
> > > warning message about it being a linked table). Open the table
> > > properties and look at the Description - that should be a copy of
> > > the Connection property that points to the table on SQL Server.
> > > That should give you a clue as to whether you're pointing to the same table.
> > >
> > > John Viescas, Author
> > >
> > > Microsoft Access 2010 Inside Out
> > >
> > > Microsoft Access 2007 Inside Out
> > >
> > > Microsoft Access 2003 Inside Out
> > >
> > > Building Microsoft Access Applications
> > >
> > > SQL Queries for Mere Mortals
> > >
> > > http://www.viescas.com/
> > >
> > > (Paris, France)
> > >
> > > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> >
> > > [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > ] On Behalf Of
> > luvmymelody
> > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 8:55 PM
> > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> >
> > > Subject: [MS_AccessPros] Linked table Question
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I have ventured into learning some SQL and I am using SQL
> > > Management
> > studio
> > > 12 the free version. I have created some tables and have linked
> > > the tables in an Access database. But the table counts for both
> > > tables are widely different. I am not sure if I have them
> > > connected, and so I do not know
> > what
> > > the linked table is looking at. The SQL has 442 records and the
> > > Linked
> > table
> > > has 590. I see the path as to the SQL database table, so I am
> > > confused. Is there something that I am missing. I created the ODBC
> > > connection and the test works.
> > >
> > > Thank You
> > >
> > > Jim Wagner
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

This email (and all attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and/or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]