Tim
I know many Access users want the latest and greatest, but is there really a need to go to 2013? Are you going to develop a web application? That would be the only reason I can see to upgrade at this point.
As far as I know Access 2010 cannot link to tables in 2013. However, you could leave the tables in 2010. But being the only one that does development why would you not use the version that the others use? When I was a contractor I had several versions of Access available to me so I could develop in the lowest denominator so I was sure that all my clients for a contract could run my applications. Not doing so is asking for trouble.
I suggest if you want to get used to 2013 do personal projects, but develop in your clients' environment for applications they will be using.
Regards,
Bill Mosca, Founder - MS_Access_Professionals
http://www.thatlldoit.com
Microsoft Office Access MVP
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=C4D9F5E7-BB03-4291-B816-64270730881E
My nothing-to-do-with-Access blog
http://wrmosca.wordpress.com
--- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com, "timdbui" <timdbui@...> wrote:
>
> Hi, would anyone of you please advise me on this issue:
> Our group consists of 4 Access 2010 users, and I am the one who does the development and administration. I slit our database into front end and back end. I am thinking about upgrading to Access 2013. My question is can I be the only one in the group who uses Access 2013 and have other users (who will use Access 2010) to link to the backend that I created via Access 2013?
>
> Thanks so much for your help!
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (2) |
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar