Mike
Instead of using a main form and a sub form with the same record source, why not put the "header" controls in the form header section? That way you don't need a sub form.
Regards,
Bill Mosca, Founder - MS_Access_Professionals
http://www.thatlldoit.com
Microsoft Office Access MVP
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=C4D9F5E7-BB03-4291-B816-64270730881E
My nothing-to-do-with-Access blog
http://wrmosca.wordpress.com
--- In ms_access_professionals@yahoogroups.com, <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Duane, the parent form is not editable - it's used as a header for consistent data such as name, address, etc. The subform is the editable form and does not have the same fields as the parent.
Thanks in advance!
Mike
Thanks in advance!
Mike
--- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com, Duane Hookom <duanehookom@...> wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> Can you justify/explain the form and subform being bound to the same table? If you edit the record on the main form and then edit the same record on the subform, I expect you will get the write conflict error.
>
>
> Duane Hookom MVP
> MS Access
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: no_reply@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > I have a form and subform bound to the same table. When making a change to a field in the subform and then closing the form, I get the Write Conflict error. However, this does not occur on ALL records. How can I identify the cause?
> >
> > By the way, the table is a linked Oracle table using the Oracle 11g driver. We recently converted from XP to Windows7, and this issue suddenly appeared. Seems to be connected but not totally sure.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> > Mike
>
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (7) |
.
__,_._,___
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar