RE: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many databases"

 

Crystal-

I don't disagree with you that RI can cause extra connections, but you said:

" my understanding is that each linked tables DOES count as at least one
connection -- more if there is RI "

My point is each linked table does not, in my opinion, cause extra connections.
That is, # of defined linked tables or even # of open linked tables <> number of
connections. Access shares existing connections when it can.

John Viescas, author
Microsoft Office Access 2010 Inside Out
Microsoft Office Access 2007 Inside Out
Building Microsoft Access Applications
Microsoft Office Access 2003 Inside Out
SQL Queries for Mere Mortals
http://www.viescas.com/
(Paris, France)

-----Original Message-----
From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Crystal
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 9:42 AM
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many databases"

Hi John,

agree on what? That RI means more connections?  I know this is true.  A database
connection in the Access count is not what we think of in human terms.

Warm Regards,
Crystal

 *
   (: have an awesome day :)
 *

________________________________
From: John Viescas <JohnV@msn.com>
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:53 PM
Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many databases"

I'm not sure I agree with Crystal.  One of the optimizations you can do for a
client-server app using linked tables is to open a Recordset on one of the
tables when the app starts up and leave it open.  The reason this works is
Access builds a connection only when needed and destroys the connection when all
usage is finished.  The overhead to build / destroy a connection is fairly high,
but if you have a connection open already, Access will share it for any further
use.  Without the connection open and if you have an app that tends to open only
one form at a time (say, from a Switchboard), the overhead to rebuild a
connection each time a form opens really slows things down.  By leaving a
connection open, it can be shared and doesn't have to be rebuilt.

John Viescas, author
Microsoft Office Access 2010 Inside Out
Microsoft Office Access 2007 Inside Out
Building Microsoft Access Applications
Microsoft Office Access 2003 Inside Out
SQL Queries for Mere Mortals
http://www.viescas.com/
(Paris, France)

-----Original Message-----
From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John Marshall
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 3:43 AM
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many databases"

So my brain does not always connect to my fingers. ;-)

John.

From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Luckman
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:23 PM
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many databases"

 

Could even be Referential Integrity ....

Cheers,

Stuart

From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of John
Marshall
Sent: Wednesday, 15 August 2012 9:17 AM
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many databases"

Other than Real Idiot, it could stand for Relational Integrity.

John... Visio MVP

-----Original Message-----
From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Steve
Conklin
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 7:05 PM
To: MS Access Pros List
Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many databases"

Crystal, I probably will smack my head and say Doh! but what is RI? Steve
To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
From: strive4peace2008@yahoo.com <mailto:strive4peace2008%40yahoo.com>
<mailto:strive4peace2008%40yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:24:59 -0700
Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many databases"

Hi Bill,

my understanding is that each linked tables DOES count as at least one
connection -- more if there is RI

Warm Regards,

Crystal

http://www.YouTube.com/LearnAccessByCrystal

*

(: have an awesome day :)

*

________________________________

From: Bill Mosca <wrmosca@comcast.net <mailto:wrmosca%40comcast.net>
<mailto:wrmosca%40comcast.net> >

To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 12:44 PM

Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many databases"

Clive

I don't buy the idea that each linked table is a connection. It's really the
number of connctions that counts. Unless you are retrieving rows or running
DML ('action') queries, no connection is made. You can see that with the
creation and destruction of the locking file.

If I remember right Windows XP can only handle 10 connections per user with
a split DB. And I have applications that link to over 100 tables.

Regards,

Bill Mosca, Founder - MS_Access_Professionals

http://www.thatlldoit.com

Microsoft Office Access MVP

https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=C4D9F5E7-BB03-4291-B816-6427073088
1E

My nothing-to-do-with-Access blog

http://wrmosca.wordpress.com

--- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> , "Clive" <zctek@...>
wrote:

>

> Hi All,

>

> Afeter a bit more searching I found another link, this

> time for Access2003 and and illustrating the difference

> between using linked and local tables.

>

>
http://bytes.com/topic/access/answers/472616-new-twist-too-many-databases-er
ror

>

> Regards, Clive.

>

> --- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> , "Clive" <zctek@> wrote:

> >

> > Hi All,

> >

> > Here is a link that sheds some more light on the subject

> > even though it was for an earlier version of Access:

> >

> > http://www.office-archive.com/23-ms-access/037cc99c3e46753c.htm

> >

> > And another link that provides a solution if you are using

> > Privacy Manager for HP Protect Tools:

> >

> > http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/

> >

> > Regards, Clive.

> >

> > --- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> , Liz Ravenwood
<liz_ravenwood@> wrote:

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > > Liz Ravenwood

> > > Programmer/Analyst

> > > Super First Class Products

> > > B/E Aerospace

> > > O: 1.520.239.4808

> > > www.beaerospace.com

> > >

> > >

> > > -----Original Message-----

> > > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of John
Viescas

> > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 1:35 PM

> > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many
databases"

> > >

> > > Not in this case. She's already setting db = CurrentDb and then not
releasing

> > > it. If you're gonna set it, might as well use it. I agree for a "one
off,"

> > > it's OK to use CurrentDb.Execute.

> > >

> > > John Viescas, author

> > > Microsoft Office Access 2010 Inside Out

> > > Microsoft Office Access 2007 Inside Out

> > > Building Microsoft Access Applications

> > > Microsoft Office Access 2003 Inside Out

> > > SQL Queries for Mere Mortals

> > > http://www.viescas.com/

> > > (Paris, France)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -----Original Message-----

> > > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Liz
Ravenwood

> > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 10:23 PM

> > > To: 'MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:%27MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:%27MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> '

> > > Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many
databases"

> > >

> > > Bill, me too.

> > >

> > > Liz Ravenwood

> > > Programmer/Analyst

> > > Super First Class Products

> > > B/E Aerospace

> > > O: 1.520.239.4808

> > > www.beaerospace.com

> > >

> > >

> > > -----Original Message-----

> > > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Bill
Mosca

> > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 1:16 PM

> > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many
databases"

> > >

> > > Liz

> > >

> > > I disagree with John. When it comes to one execution and you're done I
use

> > > CurrentDB.Execute.

> > >

> > > Bill Mosca

> > >

> > > --- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> , Liz Ravenwood

> > > <liz_ravenwood@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > John, why? Even if you're just going to do a one line deal?

> > > >

> > > > Liz Ravenwood

> > > > Programmer/Analyst

> > > > Super First Class Products

> > > > B/E Aerospace

> > > > O: 1.520.239.4808

> > > > www.beaerospace.com

> > > >

> > > > -----Original Message-----

> > > > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of John
Viescas

> > > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 12:49 PM

> > > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > > Subject: RE: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many
databases"

> > > >

> > > > Connie-

> > > >

> > > > You should *never* IMHO use CurrentDb.Execute. Always set a db
object, the

> > > use

> > > > db.Execute. Then Set db = Nothing before you exit.

> > > >

> > > > John Viescas, author

> > > > Microsoft Office Access 2010 Inside Out

> > > > Microsoft Office Access 2007 Inside Out

> > > > Building Microsoft Access Applications

> > > > Microsoft Office Access 2003 Inside Out

> > > > SQL Queries for Mere Mortals

> > > > http://www.viescas.com/

> > > > (Paris, France)

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -----Original Message-----

> > > > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > > [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
mrsgoudge

> > > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:43 PM

> > > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > > Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many
databases"

> > > >

> > > > Thanks John. One more question--I'm going through my code and found
the

> > > > following. I have both db and CurrentDb.Execute. What happens in
this

> > > > case--Does CurrentDb.Execute open one more instance of the database
in

> > > addition

> > > > to the one opened at Set db = CurrentDb? If so, how would I change
it?

> > > >

> > > > Thanks again!

> > > > Connie

> > > >

> > > > If response = vbYes Then

> > > > 'Initialize

> > > > Set db = CurrentDb

> > > > 'Turn off the "are you sure you want to delete" message

> > > > DoCmd.SetWarnings False

> > > > Dim strSQL As String

> > > > strSQL = "DELETE Withdrawn.* FROM Withdrawn WHERE
Withdrawn.ListID

> > > =

> > > > " & Me.ListID & ";"

> > > > CurrentDb.Execute strSQL, dbFailOnError

> > > > 'Turn the warning capability back on

> > > > DoCmd.SetWarnings True

> > > > 'Save Record

> > > > If Me.Dirty Then

> > > > Me.Dirty = False

> > > > End If

> > > > 'Set Current Listing to Yes

> > > > Set rstL = db.OpenRecordset("SELECT * FROM Listings
WHERE ListID =

> > > "

> > > > & Me.ListID & ";")

> > > > rstL.Edit

> > > > rstL("CurrentListing").Value = -1

> > > > rstL.Update

> > > > 'Set Status to "For Sale"

> > > > Forms!Listings.Status = "FOR SALE"

> > > > DoCmd.Close acForm, "UndoWithdrawn", acSaveNo

> > > >

> > > > End If

> > > >

> > > > --- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> , John Viescas
<JohnV@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Connie-

> > > > >

> > > > > The "too many databases" is a mystery. Me, I like to control
what's going

> > > on,

> > > > > so I always assign CurrentDb to an object variable and then make
sure I

> > > clear

> > > > it

> > > > > before exit. With CurrentDb, you know you're always opening one
more

> > > thread,

> > > > > then killing it when you Set db = Nothing. I dunno what happens
with a

> > > > > reference to DBEngine.

> > > > >

> > > > > John Viescas, author

> > > > > Microsoft Office Access 2010 Inside Out

> > > > > Microsoft Office Access 2007 Inside Out

> > > > > Building Microsoft Access Applications

> > > > > Microsoft Office Access 2003 Inside Out

> > > > > SQL Queries for Mere Mortals

> > > > > http://www.viescas.com/

> > > > > (Paris, France)

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > -----Original Message-----

> > > > > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > > > [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
mrsgoudge

> > > > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:14 PM

> > > > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > > > Subject: Re: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many
databases"

> > > > >

> > > > > John - That is code I copied from Allen Browne's site. Should I
be changing

> > > > > that? Any idea why Crystal would experience a decrease in the
"cannot open

> > > > > databases" messages using DBEngine(0)(0)?

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks!

> > > > > Connie

> > > > >

> > > > > --- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> , John Viescas
<JohnV@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Connie-

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Why are you using DBEngine(0)(0)? I would declare a db object
As

> > > > > DAO.Database,

> > > > > > set it to CurrentDb, then release it in your exit code.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > John Viescas, author

> > > > > > Microsoft Office Access 2010 Inside Out

> > > > > > Microsoft Office Access 2007 Inside Out

> > > > > > Building Microsoft Access Applications

> > > > > > Microsoft Office Access 2003 Inside Out

> > > > > > SQL Queries for Mere Mortals

> > > > > > http://www.viescas.com/

> > > > > > (Paris, France)

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -----Original Message-----

> > > > > > From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > > > > [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
mrsgoudge

> > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 8:03 PM

> > > > > > To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com>

> > > > > > Subject: [MS_AccessPros] Decreasing potential of "too many
databases"

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Good afternoon! Evening to you, John!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I am working on getting rid of the "too many databases" message
again and

> > > > > doing

> > > > > > my best to decrease the chances it will crop up. From some
reading I've

> > > > done,

> > > > > > it seems that using the following function in a query could be a
major

> > > > > > contributor. Yes? when I do get the "too many databases"
message

> > > debugging

> > > > > > shows that it's usually stopped at this point.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I'm considering putting the result in the underlying table. For
example,

> > > > once

> > > > > > the listers are entered and the ListingContacts form is closed
this would

> > > be

> > > > > > entered for that listing in

> > > > > > Listings.AllContacts.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Input? I know this doesn't really follow the rules but I can
only see the

> > > > > > benefits.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > > Connie

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Public Function ConcatRelated(strField As String, _

> > > > > > strTable As String, _

> > > > > > Optional strWhere As String, _

> > > > > > Optional strOrderBy As String, _

> > > > > > Optional strSeparator = ", ") As
Variant

> > > > > > On Error GoTo Err_Handler

> > > > > > 'Purpose: Generate a concatenated string of related
records.

> > > > > > 'Return: String variant, or Null if no matches.

> > > > > > 'Arguments: strField = name of field to get results from and

> > > > concatenate.

> > > > > > ' strTable = name of a table or query.

> > > > > > ' strWhere = WHERE clause to choose the right
values.

> > > > > > ' strOrderBy = ORDER BY clause, for sorting the
values.

> > > > > > ' strSeparator = characters to use between the
concatenated

> > > > > > values.

> > > > > > 'Notes: 1. Use square brackets around field/table names
with

> > > spaces

> > > > or

> > > > > > odd characters.

> > > > > > ' 2. strField can be a Multi-valued field (A2007
and later),

> > > > but

> > > > > > strOrderBy cannot.

> > > > > > ' 3. Nulls are omitted, zero-length strings (ZLSs)
are

> > > > returned

> > > > > as

> > > > > > ZLSs.

> > > > > > ' 4. Returning more than 255 characters to a
recordset

> > > > triggers

> > > > > > this Access bug:

> > > > > > ' http://allenbrowne.com/bug-16.html

> > > > > > Dim rs As DAO.Recordset 'Related
records

> > > > > > Dim rsMV As DAO.Recordset
'Multi-valued field

> > > > > > recordset

> > > > > > Dim strSQL As String 'SQL
statement

> > > > > > Dim strOut As String 'Output
string to

> > > > > > concatenate to.

> > > > > > Dim lngLen As Long 'Length of
string.

> > > > > > Dim bIsMultiValue As Boolean 'Flag if
strField is

> > > a

> > > > > > multi-valued field.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 'Initialize to Null

> > > > > > ConcatRelated = Null

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 'Build SQL string, and get the records.

> > > > > > strSQL = "SELECT " & strField & " FROM " & strTable

> > > > > > If strWhere <> vbNullString Then

> > > > > > strSQL = strSQL & " WHERE " & strWhere

> > > > > > End If

> > > > > > If strOrderBy <> vbNullString Then

> > > > > > strSQL = strSQL & " ORDER BY " & strOrderBy

> > > > > > End If

> > > > > > Set rs = DBEngine(0)(0).OpenRecordset(strSQL, dbOpenDynaset)

> > > > > > 'Determine if the requested field is multi-valued (Type is
above 100.)

> > > > > > bIsMultiValue = (rs(0).Type > 100)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 'Loop through the matching records

> > > > > > Do While Not rs.EOF

> > > > > > If bIsMultiValue Then

> > > > > > 'For multi-valued field, loop through the values

> > > > > > Set rsMV = rs(0).Value

> > > > > > Do While Not rsMV.EOF

> > > > > > If Not IsNull(rsMV(0)) Then

> > > > > > strOut = strOut & rsMV(0) & strSeparator

> > > > > > End If

> > > > > > rsMV.MoveNext

> > > > > > Loop

> > > > > > Set rsMV = Nothing

> > > > > > ElseIf Not IsNull(rs(0)) Then

> > > > > > strOut = strOut & rs(0) & strSeparator

> > > > > > End If

> > > > > > rs.MoveNext

> > > > > > Loop

> > > > > > rs.Close

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 'Return the string without the trailing separator.

> > > > > > lngLen = Len(strOut) - Len(strSeparator)

> > > > > > If lngLen > 0 Then

> > > > > > ConcatRelated = Left(strOut, lngLen)

> > > > > > End If

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Exit_Handler:

> > > > > > 'Clean up

> > > > > > Set rsMV = Nothing

> > > > > > Set rs = Nothing

> > > > > > Exit Function

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Err_Handler:

> > > > > > MsgBox "Error " & Err.Number & ": " & Err.Description, _

> > > > > > vbExclamation, "ConcatRelated()"

> > > > > > Resume Exit_Handler

> > > > > > End Function

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ------------------------------------

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ------------------------------------

> > > > >

> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ------------------------------------

> > > >

> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ------------------------------------

> > > >

> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > This email (and all attachments) is for the sole use of the intended

> > > recipient(s) and may contain privileged and/or proprietary
information. Any

> > > unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you are

> > > not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail
and

> > > destroy all copies of the original message.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ------------------------------------

> > >

> > > Yahoo! Groups Links

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > This email (and all attachments) is for the sole use of the intended

> > > recipient(s) and may contain privileged and/or proprietary
information. Any

> > > unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you are

> > > not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail
and

> > > destroy all copies of the original message.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ------------------------------------

> > >

> > > Yahoo! Groups Links

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ------------------------------------

> > >

> > > Yahoo! Groups Links

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > This email (and all attachments) is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain privileged and/or proprietary information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail
and destroy all copies of the original message.

> > >

> >

>

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (24)

Recent Activity:

• New Members 8
• New Files 3

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___