Thanks for confirming it. Now how about a solution/workaround?
I figured I would try turning the borders of the sub-reports off, and creating them in the subs themselves. I put a 2pt wide vertical line from 0,0 to 0,(detail ht). But I can't figure out how to make the line grow as the detail section grows. The cangrow only effects elements with related data (or their containers, like a detail section).
Crystal Reports has a feature that allows an element to span multiple sections. For example a line could go from the header to the footer, and would grow in length as the detail section grows.
Does Access such a feature?
--- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com, John Viescas <JohnV@...> wrote:
>
> Calvin-
>
>
>
> Ah, I see it. I've just uploaded some sample screen dumps into
> 2_AssistanceNeeded. Report View is even weirder with 2pt borders. The thick
> border appears around both subreports with a thin border separating them, and
> bogus horizontal scroll bars show up!
>
>
>
> I think I'll report it.
>
>
>
> John Viescas, author
>
> Microsoft Office Access 2010 Inside Out
>
> Microsoft Office Access 2007 Inside Out
>
> Building Microsoft Access Applications
>
> Microsoft Office Access 2003 Inside Out
>
> SQL Queries for Mere Mortals
>
> <http://www.viescas.com/> http://www.viescas.com/
>
> (Paris, France)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of c.krusen1
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 4:40 PM
> To: MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [MS_AccessPros] Re: Gaps between sub-reports when Border is larger than
> hairline (Access 2007)
>
>
>
>
>
> 2007 (I put it in the subject, but it got clipped)
>
> Imagine I have rptMain, rptSub1, and rptSub2. The subs are in the main report.
>
> rptSub1.top=0, .left=0, .width=4, .height=1.0, .cangrow=yes, .canshrink=yes,
> .borderstyle=solid, .borderwidth=2pt
>
> rptSub2's properties are identical to rptSub1, but with it's top=1.0.
>
> The rptSub2 moves appropriately as rptSub1 grows, but the gap between the two is
> constant (unless I set the border width to hairline).
>
> Setting rptSub2.top to anything other than 0.5, and the relative position
> between the tow subs is lost.
>
> Calvin
>
> --- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> , "Bill Mosca" <wrmosca@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Calvin
> >
> > What version of Access are you using? I just tested in 2003 and the border
> width does not affect the layout.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bill Mosca, Founder - MS_Access_Professionals
> > http://www.thatlldoit.com
> > Microsoft Office Access MVP
> > https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Bill.Mosca
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In MS_Access_Professionals@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:MS_Access_Professionals%40yahoogroups.com> , "c.krusen1" <c.krusen1@>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > There seems to be a gap between sub-reports that grows with the sub-report's
> border size. When it is set to hairline, the gap is not perceivable. But with
> larger sizes, it gets ugly.
> > >
> > > It's easily demonstrated. Just make a report, put two sub reports in it,
> align the sub-reports, set their borders to hairline and print preview. Then
> change the sub-reports' borders to 2pt and print preview again.
> > >
> > > I've played with the various parameters of the sub-reports (padding, setting
> the Top value of the lower sub to just under the height of upper one, etc..)
> with no success.
> > >
> > > Anyone run into this, or have any solutions?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > Calvin
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar